A Laboratory Study between Esthetic Restorative Materials Regarding Compression Strength

Authors

  • Atef Abdullah Hama University
  • Annan al-Ghada Hama University

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to in vivo compare the Compression Strength of Giomer, Nano Hybrid Composite, Compomer, and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement.

Materials and Methods: The research sample consisted of 40 cylindrical discs, were prepared using a metal mold (4mm height, 5mm diameter) and made of (Giomer, Beautifil II Shofu, Japan. Nanohybrid Composite, Tetric Evo Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent, Ellwangen, Germany. RMGIC, FUJI II LC, GC, Japan. Compomer, Compoglass, Ivoclar). The sample research is divided into four groups (10 each type), Specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours, Compression Strength test was then applied using test device (1mm speed) until destruction, Results were statistically analyzed by One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni.

Results: There was statistical difference between the four groups, Evo Ceram showed the greatest Compression Strength means, then Giomer, then compomer, then RMGIC.

Author Biographies

Atef Abdullah, Hama University

Associate Professor - Department of Endodontic and Operative Dentistry - Faculty of Dentistry

Annan al-Ghada, Hama University

Postgraduate Student (PhD) - Department of Endodontic and Operative Dentistry - Faculty of Dentistry

Published

2020-11-13

How to Cite

1.
عبدالله ع, الغدا ع. A Laboratory Study between Esthetic Restorative Materials Regarding Compression Strength. Tuj-hlth [Internet]. 2020Nov.13 [cited 2024Apr.19];42(5). Available from: https://journal.tishreen.edu.sy/index.php/hlthscnc/article/view/10077