Comparison between Sequestrectomy with or without Nucleotomy in Surgical Treatment of Herniated Lumbar Disc

Authors

  • Moufid Mahfoud Tishreen University
  • Mohamed Abdalrahman Tishreen University
  • Alaa Sulaiman Tishreen University

Abstract

Aim: To compare sequestrectomy without nucleotomy vs. sequestrectomy with nucleotomy in the surgical treatment of lumbar disk herniation, regarding the continuation of a postoperative low back pain and getting good surgical results in improving radicular pain, muscle weakness and recurrence rate between the two surgical techniques.

methods: 48 patients were included and 4 patients were excluded. The follow up period were divided into two periods. The mean of the first period was 4.7±0.9 months and the mean of the second period was 13.5±3.06 months and the longest follow up period was 21 months. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A where patients underwent Sequestrectomy without Nucleotomy and Group B where patients underwent Sequestrectomy with Nucleotomy.

Results: We were able to follow up 21 patients in Group A “13 males and 8 females, the median age 45 years” and 23 patients in Group B “18 males and 5 females, the median age 43 years”. The median VAS for LBP in group A decreased by 75.75% where it was decreased by 53.22% in group B (p-value=0.0001). The median VAS for radicular pain decreased by 94.2% in group A and by 89.15% in group B (p-value=0.08). The postoperative functional status represented by (ODI%) was at the end of the follow up period 21.7% in group A and 39.4% in group B (p-value=0.002). Muscle weakness was seen only as foot drop (complete or partial) and there were complete improvement in foot drop.

in 4 patients out of 7 patients in group A whereas there were complete improvement in 4 patients out of 6 patients in group B (p-value=0.9). Recurrence was seen in one patient (4.7%) in the second follow up period in group A and in two patients (8.6%) in group B (one in each follow up period). (p-value=0.7)

Conclusions: We concluded that Sequestrectomy without Nucleotomy doesn’t increase recurrence rate compared to Sequestrectomy with Nucleotomy in case the annulus fibrosis tear was less than or equal to 5 mm. Regarding clinical results, we found the results close in radicular pain and muscle weakness improvement whereas low back pain continuation and postoperative functional status were clearly better in the group of Sequestrectomy without Nucleotomy.

Author Biographies

Moufid Mahfoud, Tishreen University

Assistant Professor - Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine

Mohamed Abdalrahman, Tishreen University

Assistant Professor - Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine

Alaa Sulaiman, Tishreen University

Postgraduate Student (MSc) - Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine

Downloads

Published

2021-03-15

How to Cite

1.
محفوض م, عبد الرحمن م, سليمان ع. Comparison between Sequestrectomy with or without Nucleotomy in Surgical Treatment of Herniated Lumbar Disc. Tuj-hlth [Internet]. 2021Mar.15 [cited 2024Apr.20];43(1). Available from: https://journal.tishreen.edu.sy/index.php/hlthscnc/article/view/10457

Issue

Vol. 43 No. 1 (2021): Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the copyright and grant the right to publish in the magazine for the first time with the transfer of the commercial right to Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series

 Under a CC BY- NC-SA 04 license that allows others to share the work with of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can use a copy of their articles in their scientific activity, and on their scientific websites, provided that the place of publication is indicted in  Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series   .  The Readers have the right to send, print and subscribe to the initial version of the article, and the title of  Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series  Publisher

journal uses a CC BY-NC-SA license which mean

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
  •  
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

 

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Most read articles by the same author(s)