Comparison between endoscopic and conventional dacryocystorhinostomy in the treatment of tear duct obstruction in terms of surgical success rate and recurrence rate

Authors

  • Fayz Alaloni Tishreen University
  • Gharam Shakouf Tishreen University

Abstract

Purpose: comparison of surgical success rate and recurrence rate between external and endoscopic endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy.

Methods: 40 patients participated in this study (9 male, 31 female). Patients' information was collected, including the History ,gender and age. A comprehensive eye examination was performed an Jones 1 an Jones2 eas performed to confirm the diagnosis.

An otolaryngological examination was performed with a Rigid endoscopy (zero).

Follow up eas for 6 monthes with three reviews to assess the success of surgical procedure by evaluating the continuity or absence of tears and knowing the complications following the surgical operation.

Results: the success rate with endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy was higher (95%) with one case of recurrence (5%) verses tow cases in external Dacryocystorhinostomy and there were no significant statistical differences ( p-value=0.5 ).

Complication rate was low, with two cases of Hemorrhages with endonasal 10% verses one case in external Dacryocystorhinostomy. scaring an lip rupture have only been observed with external Dacryocystorhinostomy

Dacryocystorhinostomy Also, we did not find a clinically significant change in the mean values ​​of the tear film break up time test and the Schirmer test before and after the operation.

There were two patients whom experienced mild dryness using OSDI with change of eye condition to moderate dryness after surgery.

Conclusion:success rate of the tow procedures is similar with low Complication rate.

Author Biographies

Fayz Alaloni, Tishreen University

postgraduate Student - Department of Otolaryngology -Faculty of Medicine

Gharam Shakouf, Tishreen University

postgraduate Student - Department of Otolaryngology -Faculty of Medicine

Downloads

Published

2022-01-17

How to Cite

1.
العلوني ف, شقوف غ. Comparison between endoscopic and conventional dacryocystorhinostomy in the treatment of tear duct obstruction in terms of surgical success rate and recurrence rate. Tuj-hlth [Internet]. 2022Jan.17 [cited 2024Apr.20];43(6):299-307. Available from: https://journal.tishreen.edu.sy/index.php/hlthscnc/article/view/11558

Issue

Vol. 43 No. 6 (2021): Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series

Section

Master student researches

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the copyright and grant the right to publish in the magazine for the first time with the transfer of the commercial right to Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series

 Under a CC BY- NC-SA 04 license that allows others to share the work with of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can use a copy of their articles in their scientific activity, and on their scientific websites, provided that the place of publication is indicted in  Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series   .  The Readers have the right to send, print and subscribe to the initial version of the article, and the title of  Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series  Publisher

journal uses a CC BY-NC-SA license which mean

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
  •  
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

 

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.