معايير تمييز القرار الإداري في الفقه والقضاء دراسة مقارنة (سوريا, مصر, فرنسا)

Authors

  • مهند نوح
  • شادي اسماعيل

Abstract

كان للانتقال إلى مبدأ فصل السلطات بمفهومه النسبي أثر واضح في تحقيق الخلط بين الأعمال القانونية لسلطات الدولة, فكان لا بد من البحث عن معيار واضح يحدد الطبيعة القانونية لتلك الأعمال, خاصة  وأنها تتمايز من حيث النظام القانوني الذي يحكمها.

وتبرز أهمية هذا المعيار في تمييز القرارات الإدارية عن غيرها من الأعمال الأخرى التي تأتيها سلطات الدولة كأداة فعالة بيد الإدارة لممارسة سلطتها في مواجهة الأفراد, كونها تخضع لرقابة القضاء من جهة, وتعد قابلة للإلغاء والتعديل من قبل الإدارة من جهة أخرى, إضافة لمسؤولية الدولة عما تلحقه تلك الأعمال من ضرر بالأفراد, فيترجح الفقه والقضاء في ذلك بين معيارين, وإن رجح أحدهما على الآخر, لذا يهدف هذا البحث إلى تبيان المعيار المستخدم في تمييز القرار الإداري عن غيره من الأعمال القانونية, وموقف الفقه والقضاء السوري المصري والفرنسي من ذلك.

 

The move to the  principle of separation  of powers in its relative meaning has a clear impact in achieving the confusion between the  legal works of the state authorities. Therefore, it was necessary to search for clear criteria to identify the legal nature for those works, especially that they  differ in terms of  the legal system governing them.

These criteria are important in distinguishing the administrative decisions form the other works which the state authorities do, especially that they are an effective tool within the hand of the administration in the face of individuals being subject to the judicial control on the one hand, and that they are liable to be canceled and modified by the administration on the other hand. In addition, the state is responsible for the harm caused by these acts to individuals.

The jurisprudence and the judiciary are swinging between the two criteria even if one of them overshadows the other. This research aims to demonstrate the criteria used in distinguishing the administrative decision from the other legal works, as well as the standpoint of the Syrian, Egyptian and French jurisprudence and judiciary regarding this issue.

Author Biographies

مهند نوح

كلية الحقوق- جامعة دمشق- سورية.

شادي اسماعيل

كلية الحقوق- جامعة دمشق- سورية.

Downloads

Published

2013-02-14

How to Cite

1.
نوح م, اسماعيل ش. معايير تمييز القرار الإداري في الفقه والقضاء دراسة مقارنة (سوريا, مصر, فرنسا). Tuj-econ [Internet]. 2013Feb.14 [cited 2024Nov.25];35(1). Available from: https://journal.tishreen.edu.sy/index.php/econlaw/article/view/306

Issue

Vol. 35 No. 1 (2013): العلوم الاقتصادية والقانونية

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  • The authors retain the copyright and grant the right to publish in the magazine for the first time with the transfer of the commercial right to Tishreen University Journal of Research and Scientific Studies - Economic and Legal Sciences

     Under a CC BY- NC-SA 04 license that allows others to share the work with of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can use a copy of their articles in their scientific activity, and on their scientific websites, provided that the place of publication is indicted in  Tishreen University Journal of Research and Scientific Studies - Economic and Legal Sciences   .  The Readers have the right to send, print and subscribe to the initial version of the article, and the title of Tishreen University Journal of Research and Scientific Studies - Economic and Legal Sciences Publisher

  • journal uses a CC BY-NC-SA license which mean

    You are free to:

    • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
    •  
    • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.