Evaluation of pain level and patient’s satisfaction following harvesting gingival grafts from hard palate and tuberosity

Authors

  • Areen Hammoud Tishreen University
  • Tihama Yusef Tishreen University

Abstract

Introduction: the lateral part of hard palate is considered the most common site for harvesting free gingival grafts (FGG), and it was used for this purpose since its first introduction in 1963. Harvesting FGG from hard palate was associated with some complications, one of them was pain level in the donor site in post-operative period. So it was suggested using maxillary tuberosity as an alternative donor site.

Aim: To compare patient’s pain level after harvesting free gingival grafts (FGG) from two different donor sites, by using subjective (patient’s pain level) and objective (analgesic pills number) indices. And comparing patient’s satisfaction of the whole treatment after six months.

Materials and methods: sixteen healthy patients aged 20-50 with single recession each were recruited for the study. In group one (G1) FGGs were harvested from hard palate (HP), while in group two (G2) FGGs were harvested from maxillary tuberosity (MT). Patients were asked to return after two weeks, and Pain level was reported by the patient using a subjective index on a scale of 0 to 10. The patients were also asked to record number of analgesic pills (ibuprofen 600mg) taken. In the six month following the procedures, patients reported self-satisfaction of the whole treatment.

Results: Pain level in the HP donor site was significantly higher than in the MT donor site during the first two postoperative weeks (6,5 ± 1,3 versus 3,0 ± 1,0 respectively). There were significant differences in analgesic consumption between the two groups with higher consumption in HP group (7,25 ± 2.1) versus (4,1 ± 1,6) in MT group. There were no significant differences in terms of patient’s satisfaction.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, FGGs harvested from MT donor site might provide a better option than FGGs harvested from HP in terms of less postoperative pain. And this postoperative pain affects very weakly patient’s satisfaction for the whole treatment.  

Downloads

Published

2022-11-13

How to Cite

1.
حمود ع, تهامة يوسف. Evaluation of pain level and patient’s satisfaction following harvesting gingival grafts from hard palate and tuberosity. Tuj-hlth [Internet]. 2022Nov.13 [cited 2024Dec.21];44(5):175-89. Available from: https://journal.tishreen.edu.sy/index.php/hlthscnc/article/view/13262

Issue

Vol. 44 No. 5 (2022): Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series

Section

Master student researches

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the copyright and grant the right to publish in the magazine for the first time with the transfer of the commercial right to Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series

 Under a CC BY- NC-SA 04 license that allows others to share the work with of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can use a copy of their articles in their scientific activity, and on their scientific websites, provided that the place of publication is indicted in  Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series   .  The Readers have the right to send, print and subscribe to the initial version of the article, and the title of  Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series  Publisher

journal uses a CC BY-NC-SA license which mean

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
  •  
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

 

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.