A comparative clinical study to evaluate the retention of the maxillary complete removable dentures bases using two different final impression materials (An In vivo study)

Authors

  • Ahmed Fadeh Tishreen University
  • Majd Salman Tishreen University

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare Polyether as a final impression (by a custom tray in the monophase technique) in terms of retention of the maxillary complete dentures bases with dentures bases which was made using low fusing impression compound and Zinc Oxide – Eugenol (ZOE). Also, to find out the possibility of being an alternative material for final impression.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     

Materials & Methods: Ten patients had been grouped, and then two final impressions were made for the maxillary of each patient by a custom tray. The first final impression was made by low fusing impression compound followed by ZOE, and the second one was made by Polyether in medium viscosity in the monophase technique and without border molding. After that, a test for the retention of the maxillary complete dentures bases made from these materials was done for each impression.

Results: The results showed there was no significant difference in the retention of the maxillary complete dentures bases made on the master casts made from both materials that been made by low fusing impression compound followed by ZOE, and Polyether in medium viscosity in the monophase technique and without border molding.

Conclusion: The maxillary complete dentures bases made from the final impression of Polyether in medium viscosity in the monophase technique and without border molding have the same retention of the maxillary complete dentures bases made from the final impression by low fusing impression compound followed by ZOE.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-18

How to Cite

1.
فضة أ, مجد سلمان. A comparative clinical study to evaluate the retention of the maxillary complete removable dentures bases using two different final impression materials (An In vivo study). Tuj-hlth [Internet]. 2023Jul.18 [cited 2024Apr.28];45(3):197-20. Available from: https://journal.tishreen.edu.sy/index.php/hlthscnc/article/view/14831

Issue

Vol. 45 No. 3 (2023): Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series

Section

Master student researches

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the copyright and grant the right to publish in the magazine for the first time with the transfer of the commercial right to Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series

 Under a CC BY- NC-SA 04 license that allows others to share the work with of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can use a copy of their articles in their scientific activity, and on their scientific websites, provided that the place of publication is indicted in  Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series   .  The Readers have the right to send, print and subscribe to the initial version of the article, and the title of  Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series  Publisher

journal uses a CC BY-NC-SA license which mean

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
  •  
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

 

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.