Effectiveness of negative pressure dressing compared with conventional dressing

Authors

  • Ali Ismail Tishreen University
  • Firas Melhem Tishreen University

Abstract

Introduction: Skin grafting as a reconstructive option in the ladder of closing soft tissue defects is one of the most common procedures available to Plastic surgeons.

Graft fixation is critical for the successful survival of a skin graft. Conventional dressing fixation may induce inappropriate pressure and increase wound complications. Negative pressure dressing could be utilized to secure a skin graft and reduce healing time.

The objective: Comparison of efficacy and complications between negative pressure dressing and conventional mechanical fixation in skin grafting.

Methods and materials: A Comparative Prospective study conducted for the period one year (Jan 2021 – Feb 2022) at Tishreen University Hospital in Lattakia-Syria. The study included two groups of patients were compared: group I consisted of 17 patients (46%) who underwent skin graft fixation with negative pressure dressing, whereas group II consisted of 20 patients (54%) who underwent skin graft fixation with conventional dressing.

Results: The recovery time was significantly shorter in the first group (9.41 ± 1.8 vs. 12.68 ± 3.9 in the control group, P-value: 0.001). Bait taking was greater in the first group (88.2%) than in the second group (80%), but without statistical significance (P-value: 0.8). The complication rate in the first group was 17.7% compared to 30% in the second group without significant difference (P-value: 0.7). Factors associated with a longer recovery time in the first group were: smoking (P-value: 0.001) and head and neck defects (P-value: 0.01). While in the second group: smoking (P-value: 0.04), and defects on the trunk (P-value: 0.05).

Conclusion: The current study demonstrated favorable results in efficiency of fixing skin grafts with two techniques, with significantly shorter duration of recovery in patients who underwent skin graft fixation with negative pressure dressing compared with the other group.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-24

How to Cite

1.
إسماعيل ع, فراس ملحم. Effectiveness of negative pressure dressing compared with conventional dressing. Tuj-hlth [Internet]. 2023Jul.24 [cited 2024Apr.28];45(3):393-407. Available from: https://journal.tishreen.edu.sy/index.php/hlthscnc/article/view/14912

Issue

Vol. 45 No. 3 (2023): Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series

Section

Master student researches

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the copyright and grant the right to publish in the magazine for the first time with the transfer of the commercial right to Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series

 Under a CC BY- NC-SA 04 license that allows others to share the work with of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can use a copy of their articles in their scientific activity, and on their scientific websites, provided that the place of publication is indicted in  Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series   .  The Readers have the right to send, print and subscribe to the initial version of the article, and the title of  Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series  Publisher

journal uses a CC BY-NC-SA license which mean

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
  •  
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

 

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.