A comparative radiographic study to evaluate bone density around titanium implants supporting zirconia crowns compared with zirconia crowns lined with PEEK material after one year of functional loading.

Authors

  • Batoul Sleman Tishreen University
  • Nazih Issa Tishreen University
  • Tihama Youssef Tishreen University

Abstract

Considering that changing the support over the implant affects the shape of the forces transmitted to the bone. The aim of this research was to study the effect of two different types of abutments on the integrity and health of the bone around them by comparing the bone density around titanium implants supporting zirconia restorations with zirconia restorations with a polyether ether ketone base manufactured by CAD/CAM. Within one year after functional loading.

The research sample consisted of 28 titanium implants distributed among 14 patients who had the loss of one posterior tooth on each side according to the type of abutment: the posterior loss was compensated for with one titanium implant on each side of the same jaw, and after complete healing, that is, about three months after surgery, the prostheses placement. Radiological examinations of patients using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) were performed before implantation and after 6-12 months of prosthesis and functional loading. A comparison was made between the bone densities around the implants on the patient's right and left sides.

Bone density was measured around each implant in three apical-body-neck areas and arithmetic averages of density values were taken during the observation period. The data were analysed using the student test for the difference in means of values between two independent samples (Independent Samples Test) using the statistical program SPSS. The results showed that the sig value (0.161) is greater than the value of the significance level (0.05), and therefore we accept the null hypothesis that there are significant differences between the densities values. Recorded bone mass around implants according to the material used in the prosthesis.

The results of this study, through CBCT images, showed a significant increase in bone density around titanium implants supporting zirconia prostheses with a layer of polyether ether ketone (PEEK), better than those loaded with traditional zirconia crowns, with statistically significant differences. Thus, it shows an advantage in using these fewer rigid materials and taking advantage of their advantages. To improve bone quality around implants

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31

How to Cite

1.
سليمان ب, نزيه عيسى, تهامة يوسف. A comparative radiographic study to evaluate bone density around titanium implants supporting zirconia crowns compared with zirconia crowns lined with PEEK material after one year of functional loading. Tuj-hlth [Internet]. 2024Jan.31 [cited 2024Apr.28];45(6):379-86. Available from: https://journal.tishreen.edu.sy/index.php/hlthscnc/article/view/16376

Issue

Vol. 45 No. 6 (2023): Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series

Section

Master student researches

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the copyright and grant the right to publish in the magazine for the first time with the transfer of the commercial right to Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series

 Under a CC BY- NC-SA 04 license that allows others to share the work with of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can use a copy of their articles in their scientific activity, and on their scientific websites, provided that the place of publication is indicted in  Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series   .  The Readers have the right to send, print and subscribe to the initial version of the article, and the title of  Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series  Publisher

journal uses a CC BY-NC-SA license which mean

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
  •  
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

 

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.