The dialectic of the prince and republicanism in Machiavelli's thought (A study about the features of the cognitive method and political purposes)
Abstract
This research deals with the issue of Contradiction between two books: The Prince and The Discourses on Livy, by the Italian political thinker Niccolo Machiavelli. First The Prince discusses the system of monarchical rule based on the absolute powers of the prince, and in this book, Machiavelli discusses the necessary political skills in different political situations. On the other hand, The Discourses analyzes political theory and compares between the Republic and the Emirate, showing how political civilization has evolved. In this book, Machiavelli discusses Anacyclosis theory in politics, where one political system transitions to another according to a historical movement characterized by disturbance.
The main paradox is that Machiavelli uses a similar epistemological approach in both books, with a clear difference in the topic. His political approach is based on the combination of experience and contemplation on history, which contradicts the ideal political perceptions inherited from the medieval age. He also relied on elevating self-experience and selfish interests in determining the best political decision according to expected political situations, all of this was accompanied by the decisive separation of politics from ethics.
Thus, we can observe how Machiavelli's description of the political community is based on view that includes a fierce conflict mixed with the competition of selfish desires and human chaotic ambitions. He saw that the political world is full of political tricks, deception, violence, and wars. Politics is the art of the possible, i.e. the art of the available possibilities according to the political reality, and it is not do of what ought to be, i.e. the ideal perception imposed on reality. Despite Machiavelli's use of similar language and methodology in both of his books, so the relationship of the perception of the prince derived from the first book to the perception of the republican tendency derived from the Book of Discourses is the source of understanding and interpretation of Machiavelli's general theory.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
journal uses a CC BY-NC-SA license which mean
The authors retain the copyright and grant the right to publish in the magazine for the first time with the transfer of the commercial right to the Tishreen University Journal- Arts and Humanities Sciences Series
Under a CC BY- NC-SA 04 license that allows others to share the work with of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors can use a copy of their articles in their scientific activity, and on their scientific websites, provided that the place of publication is indicted in Tishreen University Journal- Arts and Humanities Sciences Series. The Readers have the right to send, print and subscribe to the initial version of the article, and the title of Tishreen University Journal- Arts and Humanities Sciences Series Publisher
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
