مقارنة النتائج العلاجية لخزع تضيق الإحليل بالليزر مع الخزع البارد

Authors

  • حسان ناصر
  • أحمد عبود

Abstract

شملت الدراسة 40 مريضاً لديهم تضيق إحليل مفرد بطول أقل من 1سم ,تراوحت أعمارهم بين (20-75)سنة، راجعوا مشفى الأسد الجامعي(العيادة البولية والإسعاف)  في اللاذقية بين عامي 2011-2012 .

تم توزيعهم في مجموعتين (A)-(B).

الأولى تم علاج المرضى باستخدام تقنية الهليوم ليزر.

الثانية باستخدام الخزع بالسكين البارد (الخزع التقليدي).

وتم توزيع المرضى في المجموعتين دون أي اعتبارات أو اختلافات إحصائية في الآلية الإمراضية لتضيق الإحليل ولا موقع التضيق , ولا الأمراض السريرية الناتجة عنها, سوى أن جميع المرضى لديهم تضيق مفرد واحد
لا يتجاوز طوله 1 سم .

تم تقييم فعالية العلاج باستخدام Uroflowmetry , حيث أجري لجميع المرضى قياس لمعدل جريان البول قبل العلاج وبعد العلاج بـ 3 أشهر ثم بعد 6 أشهر.[1]

وأظهرت الدراسة الإحصائية فروقاً واضحة في كفاءة العلاج لصالح الخزع بالليزر (0,05>P).

كما قمنا بمقارنة نتائجنا بدراسات عالمية وأشرنا إلى مواقع التوافق معها .

Our study included 40 patients with a single length of less than 1 cm Urethral Stricture, between the ages of (20-75) years, reviewed the Assad University Hospital (Urinary clinic and Emergency Room) in Latakia between 2011-2012.
Patients were distributed in two groups (A) - (B)

The first group were treated using the technique of laser helium.
The second group treated using a cold knife (a traditional biopsy).

Patients were distributed in both groups without any considerations or statistical differences in the Pathogenicity mechanism, the stricture site, or any clinical diseases caused by them, but that all patients have a a single Urethral Stricture that does not exceed a length of 1 cm.

The effectiveness of treatment were then evaluate using Uroflowmetry, where all patients was conducted to measure the rate of flow of urine before treatment and after treatment at 3 months and then after 6 months.

Statistical study showed clear differences in the efficiency of treatment in favor of laser Urethrotomy(0,05> P).

As we compare our results with three global studies and pointed to the compatibility with sites.

Author Biographies

حسان ناصر

كلية الطب - جامعة تشرين – اللاذقية -  سورية.

أحمد عبود

كلية الطب - جامعة تشرين – اللاذقية -  سورية.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-23

How to Cite

1.
ناصر ح, عبود أ. مقارنة النتائج العلاجية لخزع تضيق الإحليل بالليزر مع الخزع البارد. Tuj-hlth [Internet]. 2013Dec.23 [cited 2024Nov.24];35(4). Available from: https://journal.tishreen.edu.sy/index.php/hlthscnc/article/view/291

Issue

Vol. 35 No. 4 (2013): العلوم الصحية

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the copyright and grant the right to publish in the magazine for the first time with the transfer of the commercial right to Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series

 Under a CC BY- NC-SA 04 license that allows others to share the work with of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can use a copy of their articles in their scientific activity, and on their scientific websites, provided that the place of publication is indicted in  Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series   .  The Readers have the right to send, print and subscribe to the initial version of the article, and the title of  Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series  Publisher

journal uses a CC BY-NC-SA license which mean

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
  •  
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

 

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Most read articles by the same author(s)